Search Results

Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) made of cordierite are generally used for diesel engine aftertreatment systems in both on-road and commercial off-highway vehicles to meet today’s worldwide emission regulations. PM/PN and NOx emission regulations will become more stringent worldwide, as represented by CARB2027 and Euro7. Technologies that can meet these strict regulations are required. As a result, aftertreatment systems have become more complex with limited space. Recently, off-highway OEMs have been interested in downsizing the aftertreatment system using concepts such as DOConFilter in an effort to reduce the size of the exhaust system. DOConFilter can effectively replace DOC + CSF or DOC + bare DPF systems with a single zone coated particulate filter. DOConFilter systems have an increased amount of coating compared to CSF as higher-filtration filters will become the norm. An undesirable increase in pressure drop is expected by adopting this new technology.

Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) are becoming mandatory for many Heavy Duty Vehicle (HDV) and Non Road Mobile Machinery (NRMM) applications as the requirement for particulate filtration performance has increased over this past decade. In a previous study, a new generation of cordierite DPF was developed to meet the latest major emission regulations; PN-PEMS requirement for EuroVI StepE, while maintaining a lower pressure drop and high ash capacity. Despite the improvements made in the latest generation DPF material, the introduction of tighter particulate regulations demands further improvement in DPF technology. More specifically, PN emission limits for Euro7 under wide operation conditions in conjunction with PN down to 10nm, as described in the proposal from Consortium for Ultra Low Vehicle Emission (CLOVE), requires further improvement in PN filtration performance. Pressure drop, which may negatively influence the CO2 emissions, remains a key performance criteria.

Recent studies have shown that for a given RON, fuels with a higher sensitivity (RON-MON) tend to have better antiknock performance at most knock-limited conditions in modern engines. The underlying chemistry behind fuel sensitivity was therefore investigated to understand why this trend occurs. Chemical kinetic models were used to study fuels of varying sensitivities; in particular their autoignition delay times and chemical intermediates were compared. As is well known, non-sensitive fuels tend to be paraffins, while the higher sensitivity fuels tend to be olefins, aromatics, diolefins, napthenes, and alcohols. A more exact relationship between sensitivity and the fuel's chemical structure was not found to be apparent. High sensitivity fuels can have vastly different chemical structures. The results showed that the autoignition delay time (τ) behaved differently at different temperatures. At temperatures below 775 K and above 900 K, τ has a strong temperature dependence.